Development of a Technique for Determining the Optimal Number of Projections when Realizing the Method of Multiangle Scanning of an Ionizing Radiation Beam

A. A. Bulavskaya; Булавская А. А.; E. A. Bushmina; Бушмина Е. А.; A. A. Grigorieva; Григорьева А. А.; A. S. Ermakova; Ермакова А. С.; I. A. Miloichikova; Милойчикова И. А.; S. G. Stuchebrov; Стучебров С. Г.

doi:10.31857/S0032816223030187

Development of a Technique for Determining the Optimal Number of Projections when Realizing the Method of Multiangle Scanning of an Ionizing Radiation Beam

Authors: Bulavskaya A.A.¹, Bushmina E.A.¹, Grigorieva A.A.¹, Ermakova A.S.¹, Miloichikova I.A.¹^,2, Stuchebrov S.G.¹
Affiliations:
1. National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
2. Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences
Issue: No 4 (2023)
Pages: 101-107
Section: ОБЩАЯ ЭКСПЕРИМЕНТАЛЬНАЯ ТЕХНИКА
URL: https://freezetech.ru/0032-8162/article/view/670484
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0032816223030187
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CVSVFW
ID: 670484

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription Access

Abstract

A method of multiangle scanning for measuring the cross-sectional beam intensity distribution has been developed. This method is based on reconstructing the beam profiles obtained at different angles in a plane perpendicular to the beam axis. To efficiently implement the multiangle scanning method, it is necessary to find the optimal number of projections, i.e., such a number for which the measurement result remains reliable with a minimum measurement time. A numerical simulation provided the development of a technique for finding the optimal number of projections, and it was shown that the optimal number is ten if the errors due to operation of units of the experimental setup are disregarded. To eliminate this error, multiangle X-ray beam scanning was carried out and its intensity distributions in the cross section were reconstructed with different numbers of projections. The developed technique was used to determine the optimal number of projections for this experimental setup, which were 18.

References

Wolski A. Beam dynamics in high energy particle accelerators. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 2014.
Patterson H.W. Accelerator health physics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2012.
Hamm R.W., Hamm M.E. Industrial accelerators and their applications. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 2012.
Okabe S., Tabata T., Tsumori K. // Japanese Journal of Applied Physics. 1966. T. 5. № 1. C. 68. https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.5.68
Michail C., Valais I., Seferis I., Kalyvas N., David S., Fountos G., Kandarakis I. // Radiation Measurements. 2014. T. 70. C. 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2014.09.008
Ronda C.R. Luminescence: from theory to applications. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2007.
Ozawa L. // Journal of The Electrochemical Society. 1979. T. 126. № 1. C. 106. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2128962
Johnson C.D. // Preprint № CERN-PS-90-42-AR. 1990.
Borca V.C., Pasquino M., Russo G., Grosso P., Cante D., Sciacero P., Girelli G., La Porta M.R., Tofani S. // Journal of applied clinical medical physics. 2013. T. 14. № 2. C. 158. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i2.4111
Zhu X.R., Yoo S., Jursinic P.A., Grimm D.F., Lopez F., Rownd J.J., Gillin M.T. // Medical physics. 2003. T. 30. № 5. C. 912. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1568979
Amerio S., Boriano A., Bourhaleb F., Cirio R., Donetti M., Fidanzio A., Garelli E., Giordanengo S., Madon E., Marchetto F., Nastasi U., Peroni C., Piermattei A., Sanz Freire C.J., Sardo A., Trevisiol E. // Medical physics. 2004. T. 31. № 2. C. 414. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1639992
Spezi E., Angelini A.L., Romani F., Ferri A. // Physics in Medicine & Biology. 2005. T. 50. №. 14. C. 3361. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/50/14/012
https://www.elsesolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/StarTrack.pdf
https://www.iba-dosimetry.com/product/matrixx-universal-detector-array/
Létourneau D., Gulam M., Yan D., Oldham M., Wong J.W. // Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2004. T. 70. № 2. C. 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2003.10.014
Bal C., Bravin E., Lefevre T., Scrivens R., Taborelli M. // Proc. of DIPAC 2005. Lyon, France. CERN, 2005. № CERN-AB-2005-067.
Duggal A.R., Srivastava A.M. US Paten 6566808. 2003.
Cheymol B. Th. Docteur d’Universit´e dans la specialit’e de Physique des Particules. Université Blaise Pascal-Clermont-Ferrand II, 2011.
Boogert S.T., Blair G.A., Boorman G., Bosco A., Deacon L.C., Karataev P., Aryshev A., Fukuda M., Terunuma N., Urakawa J., Corner L., Delerue N., Foster B., Howell D., Newman M., et al. // Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams. 2010. T. 13. № 12. C. 122801. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.13.122801
Pozimski J., Gibson S.M. // Proc. of the 2nd International Beam Instrumentation Conference IBIC2013. UK, Oxford, 2013. C. 503.
Nazhmudinov R.M., Kubankin A.S., Kishin I.A., Zhukova P.N., Nasonova V.A., Karataev P.V., Vukolov A.V., Potylitsyn A.P. // Journal of Instrumentation. 2018. T. 13. № 12. C. P12012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/13/12/P12012
Trad G. Thesis … Doctor from the University of Grenoble. Speciality: Subatomic Physics and Astroparticles. U. Grenoble Alpes, 2013.
Stuchebrov S.G., Cherepennikov Y.M., Krasnykh A.A., Miloichikova I.A., Vukolov A.V. // Journal of Instrumentation. 2018. T. 13. № 05. C. C05020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/13/05/C05020
Bulavskaya A.A., Cherepennikov Y.M., Chakhlov S.V., Grigorieva A.A., Miloichikova I.A., Vukolov A.V., Stuchebrov S.G. // IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering: IOP Publishing. 2021. T. 1019. № 1. C. 012043. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1019/1/012043
Казначеева А.О. Современные виды томографии: учебное пособие. СПб.: СПбГУ ИТМО. 2006.
Wang Z., Bovik A.C., Sheikh H.R., Simoncelli E.P. // IEEE transactions on image processing. 2004. T. 13. № 4. C. 600.
Shi H., Luo S., Yang Z., Wu G. // PLoS one. 2015. T. 10. № 9. C. e0138498. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138498
Chen C.C., Chu H.T. // 29th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC'05). IEEE, 2005. T. 2. C. 41. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2005.140
Wang L., Zhang Y., Feng J. // IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence. 2005. T. 27. № 8. C. 1334. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2005.165
Maurer C.R., Qi R., Raghavan V. // IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 2003. T. 25. № 2. C. 265. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2003.1177156
Двилис Э.С. Дис. … докт. физ.-мат. наук. Томск: Томский политехнический университет, 2013.
https://www.crystals.saint-gobain.com/products/bc-408-bc-412-bc-416
https://www.onsemi.com/products/sensors/photodetectors-sipm-spad/silicon-photomultipliers-sipm/j-series%20sipm
ГОСТ 33366.1-2015 (ISO 1043-1:2011) Пластмассы. Условные обозначения и сокращения. Часть 1. Основные полимеры и их специальные характеристики. М.: Стандартинформ, 2016.
https://www.eworldtrade.com/c/amerlighting/
https://old.aspect-dubna.ru/new/page.php%3Fpage=431.html
https://old.aspect-dubna.ru/new/page.php%3Fpage=309.html
https://old.aspect-dubna.ru/new/page.php%3Fpage=492.html
Красных А.А., Черепенников Ю.М., Милойчикова И.А., Стучебров С.Г. Свидетельство о государственной регистрации программ для ЭВМ № 2019610265 РФ // Опубл. 09.01.19.
http://www.gafchromic.com/documents/EBT3_Specifications.pdf
https://www.epson.ru/catalog/scanners/epson-perfection-v750-pro/
https://uk.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html
https://ncontrol.ru/catalog/rentgenovskiy_kontrol/rentgenovskie_apparaty/rentgenovskiy_apparat_rap_160_5