Participation of business and non-profit organizations in the implementation of national projects and sustainable development agenda (with reference to Krasnoyarsk Krai)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The methodological basis for the study of regional business entities’ participation in the ESG agenda and the implementation of national projects was the concept of sustainable development and resource theory. According to the results of a survey of 208 respondents from 144 organizations in the private and public sectors of the economy of Krasnoyarsk Krai, large state-owned companies lag significantly behind large private companies in terms of their participation in the implementation of national projects and the ESG agenda. The involvement of SMEs and NGOs is weaker, the main obstacles being a lack of resources, poor awareness of participation tools and a lack of understanding of the benefits of participation.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Bela Bataeva

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: BBataeva@fa.ru

Grand Ph.D. in Economics, Professor, Department of Corporate Finance and Corporate Governance

Russian Federation, Moscow

Natalya Kiseleva

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Email: nkiseleva@fa.ru

Ph.D. in Sociology, Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences and Mass Communications

Russian Federation, Moscow

Liudmila Cheglakova

National Research University Higher School of Economics

Email: lcheglakova@hse.ru

Ph.D. in Sociology, Associate Professor, Department of Organisational Behaviour and Human Resource Management, Graduate School of Business

Russian Federation, Moscow

Boris Sytin

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Email: bssytin@fa.ru

Chief Specialist, Center for Advanced Research and Development in Education

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Вдовин И.А., Венглинский Д.Р. Проблема привлечения внебюджетных инвестиций в национальные проекты // Бизнес. Общество. Власть. 2020. № 2–3. C. 74–86.
  2. George G., Howard-Grenville J., Joshi A., Tihanyi L. Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research // Academy of Management Journal. 2016. Vol. 59. № 6. P. 1880–1895. URL: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.4007
  3. Wai-Khuen W., Boon-Heng T., Siow-Hooi T. The influence of external stakeholders on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting: Toward a conceptual framework for ESG disclosure // Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015). 2023. Vol. 17. № 2. P. 9–20.
  4. Бобылев С.Н., Соловьева С.В. Цели устойчивого развития для будущего России // Проблемы прогнозирования. 2017. № 3. C. 26–33.
  5. Сахаров А.Г., Колмар О.И. Перспективы реализации Целей устойчивого развития ООН в России // Вестник международных организаций: образование, наука, новая экономика. 2019. T. 14. № 1. C. 189–206. doi: 10.17323/1996-7845-2019-01-11
  6. Перов А.В., Симонов К.В. Увлечение ESG-тематикой как лакмусовая бумага российской системы госуправления // Власть. 2023. T. 31. № 1. C. 9–17.
  7. Alshbili I., Elamer A.A., Beddewela E. Ownership types, corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: Empirical evidence from a developing country // Accounting Research Journal. 2020. Vol. 33. № 1. P. 148–166. doi: 10.1108/ARJ-03-2018-0060
  8. Измайлова М.А. ESG-повестка в России: современное развитие и механизм трансформации российских компаний. Часть 1 // МИР (Модернизация. Инновации. Развитие). 2023. T. 14. № 3. C. 344–360. doi: 10.18184/2079-4665.2023.14.3.344-360
  9. The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective / Pfeffer J., Salancik G. New York: Harper & Row, 1978. 300 p.
  10. Liu Z., Zheng R., Qiu Z., Jiang X. Stakeholders and ESG disclosure strategies adoption: The role of goals compatibility and resources dependence. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene. 2022. Vol. 10. № 1. P. 1–12.
  11. Ghazali N.A.M., Weetman P. Perpetuating traditional influences: Voluntary disclosure in Malaysia following the economic crisis // Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation. 2006. Vol. 15. № 2. P. 226–248. doi: 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2006.08.001
  12. Luo S., Courtenay S.M., Hossain M. The effect of voluntary disclosure, ownership structure and proprietary cost on the return–future earnings relation // Pacific–Basin Finance Journal. 2006. Vol. 14. № 5. P. 501–521. doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2006.02.002
  13. Стратегии предпринимательства: бизнес-экосистемы, реальные ценности, общество / Шаркова А. В.; Под ред. М.А. Эскиндаров 2-е изд. М.: ИТК Дашков и К. 2024. 473 с.
  14. Qian T., Yang C. State-owned equity participation and corporations’ ESG performance in China: The mediating role of top management incentives // Sustainability. 2023. Vol. 15. № 15. P. 11507. doi: 10.3390/su151511507
  15. Кузин Д.В. Концепции российского корпоративного управления: эволюция и сравнительный анализ // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 6. Экономика. 2024. № 1. C. 3–28. doi: 10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-59-1-1
  16. Boubakri N., Saffar W. State ownership and debt choice: Evidence from privatization // Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 2019. Vol. 54. № 3. P. 1313–1346.
  17. Han Y., Ciji S., Zengji S. Can state ownership promote the technological innovation of private enterprises? Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies // Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics. 2021. Vol. 23. № 6. P. 20–34.
  18. Zeng M., Li C., Li Y. How does the State-Owned Capital Shareholder Affect the Cash Holding of Private Enterprises? Based on the dual perspective of “cooperative advantages” and “competitive balances” // Bus. Manag. J. 2022. Vol. 44. P. 134–152.
  19. Смотрицкая И.И., Фролова Н.Д. Качество корпоративного управления в компаниях с государственным участием: эмпирические оценки // ЭТАП: экономическая теория, анализ, практика. 2022. № 4. C. 59–85. doi: 10.24412/2071-6435-2022-4-59-85
  20. Jamali D., Neville B. Convergence versus divergence of CSR in developing countries: An embedded multi-layered institutional lens // Journal of Business Ethics. 2011. Vol. 102. № 4. P. 599–621. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0830-0
  21. Boiral O., Baron C., Gunnlaugson O. Environmental leadership and consciousness development: A case study among Canadian SMEs // Journal of business ethics. 2014. Vol. 123. P. 363–383.
  22. Bakos J., Siu M., Orengo A., Kasiri N. An analysis of environmental sustainability in small & medium‐sized enterprises: Patterns and trends // Business Strategy and the Environment. 2020. Vol. 29. № 3. P. 1285–1296. doi: 10.1002/bse.2433
  23. Хачатрян А., Назарова Н. и др. Развитие ESG в секторе МСП: результаты опроса в российских регионах. 2022. URL: https://www.nifi.ru/images/FILES/Reports/Doklad_razvitie_ESG_v_regionah_.pdf (дата обращения: 07.04.2024).
  24. Батаева Б.С., Чеглакова Л.М., Мелитонян О.А. Специфические особенности мотивации экологически ответственного поведения малого и среднего бизнеса в России // Вопросы экономики. 2024. № 3. C. 34–55. doi: 10.31857/S0207367624030031
  25. García-Sánchez I.-M., Frías-Aceituno J.-V., Rodríguez-Domínguez L. Determinants of corporate social disclosure in Spanish local governments // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2013. Vol. 39. P. 60–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.037.
  26. Алтуфьева Т.Ю. Повышение значимости соответствия экономики субъектов РФ ESG-стандартам в условиях санкций // Фундаментальные исследования. 2022. T. 12. C. 123–129. doi: 10.17513/fr.43408
  27. Stubbs W., Dahlmann F., Raven R. The purpose ecosystem and the United Nations sustainable development goals: Interactions among private sector actors and stakeholders // Journal of business ethics. 2022. Vol. 180. № 4. P. 1097–1112.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig.1. Reasons for non-participation in national projects by groups of business and NGO representatives of Krasnoyarsk Krai (in % of respondents)

Download (53KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Fig. 2. Sources of information on mechanisms of participation in the sustainable development agenda of Krasnoyarsk Krai business and NGO representatives (in % of respondents)

Download (89KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences