Cytogenetic Homeostasis and Environmental Health (Assessment Practice)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article discusses possible approaches to cytogenetic homeostasis assessment in natural populations. Various cytogenetic methods, their advantages, disadvantages, and limitations related to the study of animals in their natural habitat are considered. For a reliable characterization of environmental quality, it is recommended to supplement the data obtained in natural populations with laboratory experiments using a test object. Due to a number of features, it is proposed to use the short-living fish Nothobranchius rachovii.

About the authors

E. Yu. Krysanov

Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: krysanov@sevin.ru
Russia, 119071, Moscow

K. G. Ordzhonikidze

Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences; Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: krysanov@sevin.ru
Russia, 119071, Moscow; Russia, 119991, Moscow

S. A. Simanovsky

Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: krysanov@sevin.ru
Russia, 119071, Moscow

References

  1. Бродский И.Б., Брянцева С.А., Ковалева А.М., Урюпова Е.Ф., Гусев С.А., Сергиенко В.И., Матишов Д.Г. Микроядра как маркеры хромосомных изменений клеток // Журн. фундаментальной медицины и биологии. 2012. Т. 1. С. 4–9.
  2. Ильинских Н.Н., Ксенц А.С., Ильинских Е.Н., Васильев С.А., Манских В.Н., Ильинских И.Н. Микроядерный анализ в оценке цитогенетической нестабильности. Томск: Национальный исследовательский Томский государственный университет, 2011. 312 с.
  3. Ильинских Н.Н., Медведев М.А., Бессуднова С.С., Ильинских И.Н. Мутагенез при различных функциональных состояниях организма. Томск: Изд-во Том. ун-та, 1990. 227 с.
  4. Крюков В.И. Вариант методики учета ядерных аномалий в эритроцитах птиц // Вестник аграрной науки. 2020. Т. 1(82). С. 81–100.
  5. Орджоникидзе К.Г., Симановский С.А., Демидова Т.Б., Крысанов Е.Ю. Цитогенетические методы для оценки состояния окружающей среды. – Экологический мониторинг. Часть Х / Под ред. Гелашвили Д.Б. Нижний Новгород: Нижегородский университет, 2019. 188 с.
  6. Сычева Л.П. Цитогенетический мониторинг для оценки безопасности среды обитания человека // Гигиена и санитария. 2012. Т. 6. С. 68–72.
  7. Grisolia C.K. A comparison between mouse and fish micronucleus test using cyclophosphamide, mitomycin C and various pesticides. Mutation Research // Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis. 2002. V. 518(2). P. 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1383-5718(02)00086-4
  8. Ilyinskikh N.N., Ilyinskikh E.N., Ilyinskikh I.N. Infectious mutagenesis: Cytogenetic effects in human and animal cells as well as immunoreactivity induced by viruses, bacteria and helminthes. LAP: Lambert Academic Publishing, 2012. 224 p.
  9. The Micronucleus Assay in Toxicology. Issues in Toxicology / Eds Knasműller S., Fenech M.; UK: Croydon: CPI Group (UK) Ltd., 2019. № 39. 657 p.
  10. Koppen G., Azqueta A., Pourrut B., Brunborg G., Collins A.R., Langie S.A.S. The next three decades of the comet assay: a report of the 11th International Comet Assay Workshop // Mutagenesis. 2017. V. 32(3). P. 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/gex002
  11. Krysanov E.Y. Aneuploidy in postnatal ontogenesis of fishes // Acta Zool. Fenn. 1992. V. 191. P. 177–182.
  12. Krysanov E.Y., Ordzhonikidze K.G., Simanovsky S.A. Cytogenetic indicators in estimation of environmental state // Russ. J. Dev. Biol. 2018. V. 49. P. 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062360418010034
  13. Mateuca R.A., Decordier I., Kirsch–Volders M. Cytogenetic Methods in Human Biomonitoring: Principles and Uses. // Genetic Toxicology. Methods in Molecular Biology / Ed. Parry J., Parry E.; N.Y.: Springer, 2012. V. 817. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-421-6_15
  14. Ordzhonikidze C.G., Demidova T.B., Krysanov E.Yu. Evaluation of genetic homeostasis in animals at different stages of ontogenesis in the environment // Russ. J. Dev. Biol. 2014. V. 45. № 3. P. 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062360414030035
  15. van der Gaag M.A., van de Kerkhoff J.F.J. Mutagenicity testing of water with fish: a step forward to a reliable assay // Sci. Total Environ. 1985. V. 47. P. 293–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(85)90337-7
  16. Zakharov V.M., Krysanov E.Y., Pronin A.V., Trofimov I.E. Study of developmental homeostasis in natural populations. Health of environment concept: Methodology and practice of estimation. Russ. J. Dev. Biol. 2017. V. 48. № 6. P. 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062360417060054
  17. Zakharov V.M., Trofimov I.E. Developmental Noise and Biological System Condition: Prolegomena // Symmetry. 2022. V. 14(11). P. 2380. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14112380

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2023 Е.Ю. Крысанов, К.Г. Орджоникидзе, С.А. Симановский